Chevron in Ecuador

The archive of the Clean Up Ecuador campaign website

Court Says Chevron Can Be Pursued in Canada Over Ecuadorean Damage

By Ian Austen and Clifford Krauss, The New York Times
4 September 2015

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Friday that a group of Ecuadoreans can use an Ontario court in an attempt to collect billions of dollars from Chevron for environmental damage.

The ruling is the latest step in a 13-year legal battle over the contamination of a rain forest in Ecuador, where Texaco had oil operations. The lawsuit has pitted Ecuadorean villagers in the region of Lago Agrio against Chevron, which bought Texaco.

While a trial court in Ecuador initially awarded the villagers $17.2 billion, an appeals court reduced the damages to $9.5 billion. It was one of the largest judgments imposed by a court for environmental contamination.

But Chevron has not paid the group and has waged a vigorous legal battle against the Ecuadoreans, as well as against their American lawyers in the United States, where it argued that the original judgment had been obtained through fraud. The company has declined to accept responsibility for polluting the Ecuadorean rain forest, drawing the condemnation of international human rights and environmental activists.

In Canada, the Ecuadoreans are fighting to seize the assets of Chevron's subsidiary. Chevron countered that the Ecuadoreans should not be allowed to collect their debt in Canada because they have no direct link to the country.

The Canadian court sided with the Ecuadoreans, saying the local courts were obliged to respect the decisions of their foreign counterparts.

"Canadian courts, like many others, have adopted a generous and liberal approach to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments," the Supreme Court ruled. "To recognize and enforce such a judgment, the only prerequisite is that the foreign court had a real and substantial connection with the litigants or with the subject matter of the dispute."

The Ecuadorean farmers insist that Texaco, before it was bought by Chevron, spilled millions of gallons of toxic wastewater into waters of the Ecuadorean Amazon in the 1970s and 1980s and left unlined waste pits filled with toxic sludge. The contamination, they argued, ruined the lives and culture of several indigenous groups.

Chevron says Texaco cleaned up its mess. It has argued that most of the pollution was caused by the Ecuadorean national oil company that originally partnered with Texaco and eventually took over the fields.

Two years ago, the National Court of Justice, Ecuador's highest court, reduced the fine to $9.5 billion, although it upheld the original decision despite Chevron's cries of fraud. The Ecuadorean government has strongly supported the case against Chevron, waging its campaign on social media and encouraging activists to protest the oil company in Europe.

Last year, Chevron won a major victory when a federal judge in Manhattan ruled that a long legal effort to punish the company was marred by fraud and corruption. Still, the decision did not prohibit enforcement of the Ecuadorean judgment in courts in Canada, Brazil and Argentina, where lawyers representing indigenous Amazonian farmers have sued Chevron to seize assets.

While the Ecuadoreans may now go back to a Canadian trial court with their collection efforts, the Supreme Court noted that they might not be successful.

"That the plaintiffs in this case may ultimately not succeed on the merits of their recognition and enforcement action, or that they may not succeed in successfully collecting from the judgment debtors against whom they bring this action, are not relevant factors," the court ruled. "A party may bring an action for all kinds of strategic reasons, recognizing that their chances of collection on the judgment are minimal. It is not the role of the court to weed out cases on this basis."